In practice, imitation learning is preferred over pure reinforcement learning whenever it is possible to design a teaching agent to provide expert supervision. However, we show that when the teaching agent makes decisions with access to privileged information that is unavailable to the student, this information is marginalized during imitation learning, resulting in an imitation gap and, potentially, poor results.

In practice, imitation learning is preferred over pure reinforcement learning whenever it is possible to design a teaching agent to provide expert supervision. However, we show that when the teaching agent makes decisions with access to privileged information that is unavailable to the student, this information is marginalized during imitation learning, resulting in an "imitation gap" and, potentially, poor results. While often successful, gradual progression fails for tasks that require frequent switches between exploration and memorization. To better address these tasks and alleviate the imitation gap we propose'Adaptive Insubordination' (ADVISOR). On a suite of challenging tasks set within gridworlds, multi-agent particle environments, and high-fidelity 3D simulators, we show that on-the-fly switching with ADVISOR outperforms pure imitation, pure reinforcement learning, as well as their sequential and parallel combinations.

Why do agents often obtain better reinforcement learning policies when imitating a worse expert? We show that privileged information used by the expert is marginalized in the learned agent policy, resulting in an "imitation gap." Prior work bridges this gap via a progression from imitation learning to reinforcement learning. While often successful, gradual progression fails for tasks that require frequent switches between exploration and memorization skills. To better address these tasks and alleviate the imitation gap we propose 'Adaptive Insubordination' (ADVISOR), which dynamically reweights imitation and reward-based reinforcement learning losses during training, enabling switching between imitation and exploration. On a suite of challenging tasks, we show that ADVISOR outperforms pure imitation, pure reinforcement learning, as well as sequential combinations of these approaches.